Chemiti et al v. Kaja
Plaintiff: Venkata Chemiti and Neeraja Dasari
Defendant: Nehru Kaja
Case Number: 1:2013cv00360
Filed: February 10, 2013
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Denver Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Lewis T. Babcock
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 3, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 111 MINUTE ORDER denying 109 Defendant's Motion to Amend Findings of Fact, by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 9/3/2015. (ebuch)
August 21, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 107 ORDER granting 99 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss And Memorandum of Law in Support Thereof or, Alternatively, Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiffs' remaining Abuse of Process claim is dismissed and summary judgment is entered in favor of Defendant. This case is dismissed, with costs awarded to Defendant, by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 8/21/2015. (ebuch)
April 28, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 98 MINUTE ORDER granting 85 Motion for Leave to File a Dispositive Motion Regarding Plaintiffs' Second Claim for Relief by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 4/28/15.(dkals, )
April 27, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 97 MINUTE ENTRY for Status Conference held before Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 4/27/2015. Granting 96 the Defendant's Motion for Leave to File a Dispositive Motion Regarding Plaintiffs' Second Claim for Relief. Defendant's deadline for filing dispositive motion is May 27, 2015; the plaintiffs' deadline to respond is June 12, 2015; and the defendant's deadline to reply is June 24, 2015. Court Reporter: Tammy Hoffschildt. Hearing concluded. (kfinn)
February 11, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 75 ORDER granting 59 Defendant's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 56. Plaintiffs' first claim for relief for breach of contract is dismissed with prejudice as untimely, by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 2/11/2015. (ebuch)
January 20, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 66 COURTROOM MINUTES for Final Pretrial Conference held on 1/20/2015 before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya. ORDERED: Plaintiffs' Unopposed Motion to Vacate and Reset Pretrial Conference 62 is GRANTED. Telephonic Final Pretrial Conferenc e is reset for February 11, 2015 at 10:15 a.m. The parties shall initiate a conference call and contact chambers at 303-335-2780 at the time of the Final Pretrial Conference. A Final Pretrial Order shall be prepared by the parties and submitted to the court no later than February 4, 2015. FTR: KMT C201. (sgrim)
October 27, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 55 MINUTE ORDER denying 53 Unopposed Motion to Modify the Scheduling Order and Extend the Discovery Cutoff to December 5, 2014 and the Dispositive Motions Deadline [sic] December 19, 2014 by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 10/27/14.(dkals, )
January 24, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 39 ORDER denying without prejudice 26 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, and denying as moot 36 Rule 56(f) Motion in Response to Defendant's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 1/24/14.(dkals, )
January 2, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 37 SUPPLEMENTAL ORDER of reference to United States Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya re: 36 Renewed MOTION for Leave to Engage in Discovery Pursuant to FRCP 56(f) In response to Defendant's and 26 First MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment on STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS filed by Venkata Chemiti, Neeraja Dasari. by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 1/2/2014. (trlee, )
December 30, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 35 MINUTE ORDER denying without prejudice 34 Plaintiffs' Rule 56(f) Motion, by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 12/30/2013. (eseam)
December 9, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER Setting Scheduling Conference for 1/28/2014 at 09:45 AM in Courtroom C201 before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya, by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 12/9/13. (sgrim)
November 1, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER denying 8 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss and Memorandum of Law in Support Thereof, by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 11/1/2013. (eseam)
October 16, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER granting 14 Motion for Leave to File Amended and Supplemental Complaint by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 10/16/13.(dkals, )
March 18, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MINUTE ORDER granting 5 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond and granting 6 Motion to Amend/Correct/Modify. Granted up to and including 4/15/13. By Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 3/18/13.(mjgsl, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Chemiti et al v. Kaja
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Venkata Chemiti
Represented By: Alison Lee Ruttenberg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Neeraja Dasari
Represented By: Alison Lee Ruttenberg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nehru Kaja
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?