Schuster v. Colvin
| Tiffany Schuster |
| Carolyn W. Colvin |
| SSA Noticing |
| 1:2013cv00718 |
| March 19, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Montezuma |
| John L. Kane |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
29
ORDER granting 25 Plaintiffs Motion for Attorney Fees Pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act. Defendant shall pay attorneys fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act in the amount of $6,592.29 made payable to Plaintiff and delivered to Plaintiffs attorney, by Judge William J. Martinez on 10/3/2014.(evana, )
|
|
Filing
24
FINAL JUDGMENT. IT IS ORDERED that the Commissioner's decision is VACATED and this case is REMANDED to the Commissioner for rehearing, by Deputy Clerk on 3/3/2014. (wjmcd, )
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER Vacating Administrative Law Judge's Decision and Remanding Case to the Commissioner for re-hearing, by Judge William J. Martinez on 2/28/2014. (evana, )
|
|
Filing
12
JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES (ORDER). SS Plaintiffs Brief due by 7/25/2013. SS Defendants Brief due by 8/26/2013. SS Plaintiffs Reply Brief due by 9/10/2013. By Judge John L. Kane on 6/19/13. (mnfsl, )
|
|
Filing
6
Minute Order Regarding Instructions for Preparation of Joint Case Management Plan for Social Security Cases, by Judge John L. Kane on 3/25/13. (sgrim)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
