Gonzales v. Sizemore
| Joaquin Gonzales |
| City and County of Denver and Michael Sizemore |
| 1:2013cv00946 |
| April 12, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Denver |
| Philip A. Brimmer |
| Craig B. Shaffer |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 no Job Discrimination (National Origin) |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
55
ORDER. ORDERED that plaintiff Joaquin Gonzales's Motion to Amend or Alter the Judgment 51 is DENIED. Signed by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 03/07/16.(jhawk, )
|
|
Filing
49
ORDER by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 3/10/15. ORDERED: The Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (the Recommendation) [Docket No. 31] is ADOPTED in part. ORDERED: Defendants' Motion to Dismiss [Docket No. 13] filed by defendants the City and County of Denver, Community Planning and Development (the City) and Michael Sizemore is GRANTED in part. ORDERED: Plaintiff's claim against Mr. Sizemore under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 is DISMISSED. ORDERED: The Joint Request for Ruling with Respect to Defendant Sizemore's Objections to Recommendation of Magistrate Judge [Docket No. 48] is DENIED as MOOT. ORDERED: This case is CLOSED. (kpreu)
|
|
Filing
44
MINUTE ORDER granting 43 Motion to Reopen Case. ORDERED that this case shall be reopened by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 04/22/14.(jhawk, )
|
|
Filing
41
ORDER adopting in part 31 Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. Granting in part 13 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff's Title VII claim against the City is dismissed. The City is dismissed from this case. This ca se shall be administratively closed. The case may be reopened by either party upon a showing of good cause. Parties shall file a status report within 30 days of any action that serves to lift the automatic stay, by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 2/19/2014. (eseam)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER. Plaintiff's 22 Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint and Jury Demand is granted. Plaintiff's proposed Amended Complaint (Doc. # 22-1) is accepted for filing as of the date of this Order. The Clerk of the Court shall docket D oc. # 22-1 as the Amended Complaint. Defendants may stand on their pending Motion to Dismiss or may file a Motion to Dismiss directed to the Amended Complaint, on or before Friday, 9/6/2013. By Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 8/12/13.(mnfsl, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
