Weaver et al v. Meek et al
Pamela J. Bassett-Weaver and Steven C. Weaver |
David James Meek, Richelle Marie Meek and USA |
USA |
Pamela J. Bassett-Weaver and Steven C. Weaver |
1:2013cv01142 |
April 30, 2013 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Denver Office |
Alamosa |
R. Brooke Jackson |
Taxes |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2410 Action affecting property on which US has lien |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 25 ORDER granting 24 Motion to Remand to State Court, by Judge R. Brooke Jackson on 2/10/2014.(trlee, ) |
Filing 22 ORDER of Dismissal re: 21 Stipulation. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the United States' counterclaims against Plaintiffs are DISMISSED, and that the United States is DISMISSED from this lawsuit with prejudice under Fed. R. Civ. P. 21 and 41( a)(2), with each of the affected parties to bear its own costs and fees; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the United States is DROPPED as a named party to this action, and the case caption is amended accordingly. By Judge R. Brooke Jackson on 09/06/13. (alvsl) |
Filing 10 ORDER TO SET SCHEDULING CONFERENCE: The parties are ordered to set an initial scheduling conference in this Court (with Judge Jackson) pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.1 no later than 45 days after the answer, motion to dismiss or other response to the complaint is filed. By Judge R. Brooke Jackson on 05/06/2013. (rbjsec. ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.