United Food & Commerical Workers International Union, Local 7 v. Safeway, Inc.

Justia Dockets & Filings Tenth Circuit Colorado District Court United Food & Commerical Workers International Union, Local 7 v. Safeway, Inc.

United Food & Commerical Workers International Union, Local 7 v. Safeway, Inc.

Plaintiff:	United Food & Commerical Workers International Union, Local 7
Defendant:	Safeway, Inc.
Case Number:	1:2013cv01854
Filed:	July 12, 2013
Court:	US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office:	Denver Office
County:	Denver
Presiding Judge:	William J. Martinez
Presiding Judge:	Kristen L. Mix
Nature of Suit:	Contract: Recovery/Enforcement
Cause of Action:	05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
April 21, 2014	Filing 21 ORDER granting 19 the Parties Joint Motion to Reopen Case and the concurrently filed Joint Stipulation of Dismissal WITH PREJUDICE. Each party shall pay its own attorneys fees and costs, by Judge William J. Martinez on 4/21/2014.(evana, )
March 7, 2014	Filing 18 ORDER Denying Defendant's Motion to Dismiss and Adminitratively Closing Case. Defendants Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction ECF No. 9 is DENIED; Defendants request for sanctions, improperly contained within its Motio n to Dismiss in violation of D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(c) and WJM Revised Practice Standard III.B., is DENIED; and This case shall be ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSED. Either party may seek leave to reopen this case, for good cause shown, once arbitration of the unresolved dispute has been completed. by Judge William J. Martinez on 3/7/2014. (evana, )

Date Filed

Document Text

April 21, 2014

Filing 21 ORDER granting 19 the Parties Joint Motion to Reopen Case and the concurrently filed Joint Stipulation of Dismissal WITH PREJUDICE. Each party shall pay its own attorneys fees and costs, by Judge William J. Martinez on 4/21/2014.(evana, )

March 7, 2014

Filing 18 ORDER Denying Defendant's Motion to Dismiss and Adminitratively Closing Case. Defendants Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction ECF No. 9 is DENIED; Defendants request for sanctions, improperly contained within its Motio n to Dismiss in violation of D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(c) and WJM Revised Practice Standard III.B., is DENIED; and This case shall be ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSED. Either party may seek leave to reopen this case, for good cause shown, once arbitration of the unresolved dispute has been completed. by Judge William J. Martinez on 3/7/2014. (evana, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United Food & Commerical Workers International Union, Local 7 v. Safeway, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: United Food & Commerical Workers International Union, Local 7
Represented By:	John Patrick Bowen
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Safeway, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?