Furlow v. University of Colorado Hospital Authority et al
| Benjamine Furlow, III |
| Matthew C. Uhlenkott, University of Colorado Board of Regents and University of Colorado Hospital Authority |
| 1:2013cv02877 |
| October 22, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Richard P. Matsch |
| Personal Injury- Medical Malpractice |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
37
ORDER DISMISSING CASE: this action is dismissed as to Defendant Matthew C. Uhlenkott, M.D., each party to bear their own costs and attorneys' fees, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 10/14/2014. (jsmit)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER DIRECTING ENTRY OF FINAL JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P. 54(b) re 33 , 34 , and 30 : the judgment of dismissal, entered April 16, 2014, and the judgment awarding attorneys fees entered today, shall be entered as final judgments pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b), by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 5/23/2014. (jsmit)
|
|
Filing
26
JUDGMENT by Clerk re 25 : University of Colorado Board of Regents' Motion to Dismiss 11 is granted. University of Colorado Hospital Authority's Motion to Dismiss 12] is granted. Defendants University of Colorado Board of Regents and University of Colorado Hospital Authority are dismissed from this civil action, by Deputy Clerk on 4/16/2014. (jsmit)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
