Haffner v. Stryker Corporation et al
Plaintiff: Edward Haffner
Defendant: Stryker Corporation, Stryker Sales Corporation and Howmedica Osteonics Corporation
Case Number: 1:2014cv00186
Filed: January 22, 2014
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Denver Office
County: Weld
Presiding Judge: R. Brooke Jackson
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury- Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 28, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 47 ORDER granting 46 Stipulated Motion to Amend Portions of the Scheduling Order. Discovery due by 5/15/2015. Dispositive Motions due by 5/29/2015. by Judge R. Brooke Jackson on 1/28/15.(jdyne, )
September 29, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 39 ORDER: 28 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. by Judge R. Brooke Jackson on 9/29/14.(jdyne, )
August 1, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 36 ORDER re 28 Motion to Dismiss. Parties have 21 days to file the briefs requested. by Judge R. Brooke Jackson on 8/1/14.(jdyne, )
April 25, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDER SETTING TRIAL AND TRIAL PREPARATION CONFERENCE: This matter has been scheduled for a two-week jury trial on the docket of Judge R. Brooke Jackson in the U.S. District Courthouse, Courtroom A902, 9th Floor, 901 19th Street, Denver, Colorado, to commence on October 13, 2015 at 9:00 a.m. A Trial Preparation Conference is set for September 23, 2015 at 1:30 p.m. By Judge R. Brooke Jackson on 04/25/2014. (rbjsec. )
January 23, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER TO SET SCHEDULING CONFERENCE: The parties are ordered to set an initial scheduling conference in this Court (with Judge Jackson) pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.1 no later than 45 days after the answer, motion to dismiss or other response to the complaint is filed. By Judge R. Brooke Jackson on 01/23/2014. (rbjsec. )
January 22, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER Granting Motion for Extension of Time by Julie Christine Hoskins, District Court Judge on 01/13/2014. (dbera, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Haffner v. Stryker Corporation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Edward Haffner
Represented By: John M. Case
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Stryker Corporation
Represented By: James Lee Gray
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Stryker Sales Corporation
Represented By: James Lee Gray
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Howmedica Osteonics Corporation
Represented By: James Lee Gray
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?