Mullen et al v. Portercare Adventist Healthcare System et al
| Colorado Cross-Disability Coalition, Debbie Johnson and Cynthia Mullen |
| Portercare Adventist Healthcare System and B.S.M.C. Limited Liability Company |
| 1:2014cv00203 |
| January 24, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Douglas |
| Christine M. Arguello |
| Boyd N. Boland |
| Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
36
ORDER of Dismissal With Prejudice. By Judge Christine M. Arguello on 06/11/2014. (athom, )
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER granting 27 Unopposed Motion to Vacate Scheduling Conference. The parties shall file a stipulation or motion to dismiss with prejudice, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a) on or before May 30, 2014, or a status report addressing why dismissal has not been accomplished. By Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 04/30/2014.(athom, ) Modified on 4/30/2014 to correct text (athom, ).
|
|
Filing
22
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER entered by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 4/9/14. (bsimm)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER SETTING RULE 16(b) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND RULE 26(f) PLANNING MEETING by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 2/26/14. Scheduling Conference set for 4/14/2014 10:30 AM in Courtroom A 401 before Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland. (Simmons, B.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
