Clayton v. Samsonite Employees Retirement Income Plan, The et al
Plaintiff: D. Michael Clayton
Defendant: Samsonite Employees Retirement Income Plan, The and Samsonite LLC
Case Number: 1:2014cv00932
Filed: April 1, 2014
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Denver Office
County: Douglas
Presiding Judge: Boyd N. Boland
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 18, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 76 PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 6/18/15. (sgrim)
May 4, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 71 MINUTE ENTRY for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya: Motions Hearing held on 5/4/2015. ORDERED:The discovery deadline is extended to May 15, 2015; and June 15, 2015 for responses. ORDERED: July 31, 2015 is the close of disc overy. ORDERED: The briefing schedule for supplementing the Administrative Record is: Opening briefs are due October 30, 2015; and responses are due November 30, 2015; replies are due by December 30, 2015. ORDERED: Plaintiff's Motion to Con duct Discovery 52 is GRANTED. ORDERED: The Parties' Stipulation and Unopposed Motion to Continue Scheduling Order Deadlines Pending Ruling on Motion to Conduct Discovery and to Submit Proposed Scheduling Order Deadlines Following Ruling on Motion to Conduct Discovery 58 is GRANTED.Hearing concluded.FTR: Courtroom C201. (dhans, )
October 14, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 39 ORDER granting 33 Motion to file Third Amended Complaint, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 10/14/2014.(trlee, )
June 16, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER re: 19 Stipulation for Extension of Time and 20 Notice of Filing Amended Pleading, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 6/16/2014. (trlee, )
May 9, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 18 MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 5/9/14. The Motion to Accept Waivers as Compliance with Minute Order 17 is GRANTED. (bsimm, )
April 9, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER Drawing Case to a presiding judge and, when appropriate, to a magistrate judge by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 4/9/2014. (agarc, )
April 1, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER Directing Plaintiff to Cure Deficiencies, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 4/01/2014. (slibi, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Clayton v. Samsonite Employees Retirement Income Plan, The et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: D. Michael Clayton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Samsonite Employees Retirement Income Plan, The
Represented By: Thomas W. Carroll
Represented By: Dirk W. de Roos
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Samsonite LLC
Represented By: Thomas W. Carroll
Represented By: Dirk W. de Roos
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?