Ostrowski v. City of Montrose
| Michael Ostrowski |
| City of Montrose |
| 1:2014cv01934 |
| July 10, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Montrose |
| Kristen L. Mix |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
47
ORDER granting 41 City of Montrose's Motion for Summary Judgment. Judgment will enter against Plaintiff. Defendant is awarded costs pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d)(1) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 54.1. Entered by Judge R. Brooke Jackson on 10/26/2015. (cpear)
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER SETTING TRIAL AND TRIAL PREPARATION CONFERENCE: This matter has been scheduled for a four-day jury trial on the docket of Judge R. Brooke Jackson in the U.S. District Courthouse, Courtroom A902, 9th Floor, 901 19th Street, Denver, Colorado, to commence on December 14, 2015 at 9:00 a.m. A Trial Preparation Conference is set for November 10, 2015 at 9:00 a.m. Please see the order for details. By Judge R. Brooke Jackson on 12/17/2014. (rbjsec. )
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER TO SET SCHEDULING CONFERENCE: In light of the decline of consent to a magistrate judge by one or more of the parties in this case, and the reassignment of the case to this Court, the Scheduling Conference set December 8, 2014 before Magistrate Judge Mix is vacated. The parties are ordered to set an initial scheduling conference in this Court (with Judge Jackson) pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.1. The parties are directed to jointly contact Chambers by telephone at (303) 844-4694 or by email at Jackson_Chambers@cod.uscourts.gov to obtain a scheduling conference date within 14 days of the date of this order. See the order for details. By Judge R. Brooke Jackson on 12/2/14. (rbjsec. )
|
|
Filing
17
MINUTE ORDER; 15 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File First Amended Complaint is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court shall accept Plaintiffs Amended Complaint [#1] for filing as of the date of this Minute Order. 12 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss is DENIED as moot. 16 Plaintiff's Motion for Second Extension of Time to File Response to Motion to Dismiss is DENIED as moot. It is FURTHER ORDERED, sua sponte, that the Scheduling Conference set for 11/13/14 at 10:30 a.m. is VACATED and RESET to 12/11/2014 10:00 AM in Courtroom C204 before Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix. Parties shall submit the proposed scheduling order no later than 12/4/14, by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 11/3/14.(morti, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ostrowski v. City of Montrose | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Michael Ostrowski | |
| Represented By: | Paul Gordon |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: City of Montrose | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
