Salazar v. Maketa et al
| Gary Salazar |
| Terry Maketa and Terry Maketa (I) |
| 1:2014cv02081 |
| July 25, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Logan |
| Boyd N. Boland |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
45
ORDER adopting 41 Report and Recommendation and dismissing 11 Plaintiff's Amended Complaint without prejudice. A separate judgment in favor of Defendant and against Plaintiff shall issue. Entered by Judge Raymond P. Moore on 12/16/2015. (cpear)
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER ON RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 32 . Defendants Objection to Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge 33 is OVERRULED; The Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge 32 is ADOPTED as an order of this Court; and Defendants Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Amended Complaint 29 is DENIED, by Judge Raymond P. Moore on 10/05/2015.(cthom, )
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER Drawing Case. This case shall be drawn to a presiding judge and, if applicable, to a magistrate judge, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 9/10/2014. (slibi, )
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER Directing Plaintiff to File Amended Complaint, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 8/28/2014. (slibi, )
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER Directing Plaintiff to Cure Deficiency, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 7/28/2014. (slibi, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
