Brooks v. Archuletta et al
| Jason Brooks |
| Lou Archuletta and John Suthers |
| 1:2014cv02276 |
| August 15, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Fremont |
| Boyd N. Boland |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
34
ORDER denying 33 Motion for Reconsideration by Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 06/04/15.(nmarb, )
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 05/14/15 denying 1 Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus and dismissing this case with prejudice and denying 25 Motion for Leave to file Amended Complaint. ORDERED that there is no basis on which to issue a certificate of appealability pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c).(nmarb, )
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER To Dismiss In Part by Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 2/13/15 re: 1 Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Jason Brooks. ORDERED that within thirty days Respondents are directed to file an answer in compliance with Rule 5 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases that fully addresses the merits of the remaining claim. (nmarb, )
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER Drawing Case. This case shall be assigned to Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer as the presiding judge, by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 01/26/15. (nmarb, )
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER Directing Applicant to Cure Deficiencies, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 08/25/14. (nmarb, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
