Turner v. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.
| Leah Turner |
| Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. |
| 1:2014cv02612 |
| September 22, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Adams |
| Craig B. Shaffer |
| Fair Labor Standards Act |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
104
ORDER Regarding Notice of Collective Action. Signed by Judge John L. Kane on 12/18/15. (jhawk, )
|
|
Filing
94
ORDER. ORDERED the Motion for Immediate Interlocutory Appeal 88 is DENIED. The accompanying request to STAY proceedings during the pendency of that appeal 89 is DENIED as MOOT. Signed by Judge John L. Kane on 09/23/15.(jhawk, )
|
|
Filing
87
Memorandum Opinion and Order. Motion for Conditional Collective Action "Certification" 28 is therefore GRANTED, even though the characterization of it as a "certification" is expressly and explicitly rejected. The question of the proper FORM and MECHANISMS for effecting the requested notice is REFERRED back to the parties for resolution. Plaintiffs' Motion to Toll the Statute of Limitations for 90 days once Notice is effected 29 is GRANTED. ORDERED that the parti es shall CONFER regarding the content of this Order and the form of the ordered Notice, and shall file a Status Report along with a proposed form of Notice on or before September 24, 2015. A hearing on the matter will be set if necessary. Entered by Judge John L. Kane on 08/21/15.(jhawk, )
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER. Defendant's renewed Motion to Dismiss, directed at the Amended Complaint, was timely filed on February 11, 2015. Plaintiffs' Request (Motion) for (Expedited) Decision (Doc. 42) is DENIED. A ruling on Defendant's Motion to Stay w ill affect briefing deadlines and rulings related to Plaintiffs pending Motions, and must be addressed first. To expedite that ruling, it is ORDERED that Defendant shall file any Reply in support of it's Motion to Stay on or before March 13, 201 5. In the interim, counsel are urged to confer and consider an "omnibus" approach to obtaining rulings on the pending motions to dismiss/transfer venue/and for class certification. If a combined motions hearing date would facilitate an efficient handling of these competing issues, either party may request one by Judge John L. Kane on 03/05/15.(jhawk, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Turner v. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Leah Turner | |
| Represented By: | Karen Beth O'Connor |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
