Johnson v. Granger et al
Andrew D Johnson |
Russell Granger, R. Thomas Moorhead, Cordes & Company and Mark R Wagner |
1:2015cv00070 |
January 12, 2015 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Denver Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Marcia S. Krieger |
Michael J. Watanabe |
Other Civil Rights |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 59 JUDGMENT in favor of Cordes & Company, Mark R Wagner, R. Thomas Moorhead, Russell Granger against Andrew D Johnson re: 58 Order on Motion to Dismiss, Order on Motion for Leave, 57 Order on Report and Recommendations. Civil Case Terminated. by Clerk on 5/14/15. (pglov) |
Filing 48 MINUTE ORDER : Denying 9 Plaintiff's Motion for Costs of Service on Defendants. Granting 46 Unopposed Motion by Defendant to Vacate Scheduling Conference and Stay Rule 26(a) Disclosures Pending Determination of Motion to Dismiss, in that the Scheduling Conference set is converted to a Status Conference. Status Conference set for 3/31/2015 02:00 PM (Mountain Time) in Courtroom A 502 before Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe. Plaintiff may participate by telephone. By Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 3/11/2015.(emill) |
Filing 11 ORDER Setting Scheduling/Planning Conference for 3/31/2015 02:00 PM in Courtroom A 502, before Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe, by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 1/28/15. (dkals, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.