Peterson v. Moss
Plaintiff: Trevor Peterson
Defendant: Sterling Moss
Case Number: 1:2015cv00331
Filed: February 17, 2015
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Denver Office
County: Denver
Presiding Judge: Michael J. Watanabe
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2679
Jury Demanded By: None
RSS Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 8, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 23 Final JUDGMENT by Clerk in favor of United States of America against Trevor Peterson re: 22 Order on Motion to Dismiss, on 5/8/15. (morti, )
May 7, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER Granting the United States' Motion to Dismiss 14 . This case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case and tax costs against plaintiff under Fed. R.Civ. P. 54(d), by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 5/7/15.(morti, )
April 20, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 20 MINUTE ORDER; 17 Plaintiff's Motion for Continuation of the United States as a Defendant is DENIED as not a proper motion. 18 Plaintiff's Motion for Extension/Postponement for Scheduling Conference and 19 Plaintiff's Motion for Extension on Filing Scheduling Order are DENIED as moot, by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 4/20/15.(morti, )
April 13, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 16 MINUTE ORDER; 15 Plaintiff's Motion to Substitute Scheduling Conference Location from Denver to Durango is DENIED IN PART and GRANTED IN PART. The Scheduling Conference set for April 30, 2015, at 9:00 a.m. is VACATED, by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 4/13/15.(morti, )
March 31, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 13 MINUTE ORDER granting 8 Motion to Substitute the United States as the Sole Defendant for the Plaintiff's Claim Under the Federal Tort Claims Act; denying as moot 12 Motion for Continuation of the United States as Sole Defendant, by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 3/31/2015. United States of America added as substitute and Sterling Moss terminated (slibi, )
February 19, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER SETTING PRO SE STATUS CONFERENCE AND SETTING DEADLINE FOR FILING OF PILOT PROGRAM CONSENT FORM. On or before 3/4/2015, parties shall complete and file the Pilot Program Consent Form 3 . Consent Form due by 3/4/2015. Status Conferen ce set for 3/18/2015 02:30 PM in Courtroom A 502 before Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe. Plaintiff may appear by telephone. Parties shall meet and confer at least two weeks prior to the status conference and determine whether this case should be transferred to Magistrate Judge David L. West in the Court's Durango Division. By Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 2/19/2015. (emill)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Peterson v. Moss
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Trevor Peterson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sterling Moss
Represented By: Juan G. Villasenor(Designation Federal Agency Attorney)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?