Atlas Biologicals, Inc. v. Kutrubes et al
Plaintiff: Atlas Biologicals, Inc.
Defendant: Thomas James Kutrubes, Peak Serum, Inc. and Peak Serum, LLC
Case Number: 1:2015cv00355
Filed: February 20, 2015
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Denver Office
County: Larimer
Presiding Judge: Christine M. Arguello
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1051
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 10, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 212 ORDER that Atlas's Motion for Attorney Fees and Expert Witness Fees (Doc. # 163 ) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Atlas's Motion for Attorney Fees and Expert Witness Fees is GRANTED as to Atlas's request for attorneys' fees; judgment shall be entered in favor of Atlas and against Defendants in the amount of $308,554.50 in attorneys' fees, for which Defendants shall be jointly and severally liable; and Atlas's Motion for Attorney Fees and Expert Witness Fees is DENIED as to Atlas's request for expert witness fees, by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 7/10/2020.(evana, )
September 23, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 158 FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW that judgment shall be entered in favor of Atlas Biologicals, Inc. on its claims for federal trademark infringement; Colorado common law trademark and trade name infringement; misappropriation of trade secre ts; and breach of fiduciary duty. The Court denies Atlas's other claims for relief. That a final judgment shall be entered against Defendants Thomas James Kutrubes, Peak Serum, Inc., and Peak Serum, LLC in the amount of $2,048,180.50. Th at the preliminary injunction issued by the Court on March 25, 2015, shall be made PERMANENT. That Atlas has 30 days from the date of this Order to file a motion for attorneys' fees. Kutrubes and Peak shall file a response, if any, within 10 days of the filing of Atlas's motion for attorneys' fees, by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 9/23/2019. (evana, )
April 24, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 147 WRIT OF ATTACHMENT. By Judge Christine M. Arguello on 04/24/2018. (athom, )
July 7, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 57 PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 7/7/15. (sgrim)
June 3, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 50 ORDER Setting Scheduling Conference for 7/1/2015 09:45 AM in Courtroom C201 before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya, by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 6/3/15. (sgrim)
March 25, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 46 PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION. By Judge Christine M. Arguello on 03/25/2015. (athom, )
March 12, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 38 ORDER Extending Temporary Restraining Order and Entering Partial Injunction (Per Stipulation). It is ORDERED that this Court's Order granting Plaintiffs Ex Parte Motion for Temporary Restraining Order is extended until the Court's evidentiary hearing on 3/23/2015. By Judge Christine M. Arguello on 03/12/2015. (athom, )
March 3, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S EX PARTE MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER. ORDERED that Ex Parte Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction 5 is granted. ORDERED that, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(b)(2), this order shall expire on March 17, 2015, absent good cause shown for why the order should be extended, or consent by Defendants to extend the order. It is further ORDERED that, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P, 65(c), Plaintiff shall post a bond of $1000 as se curity. It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff shall provide notice of this order to Defendants. It is further ORDERED that the Parties are instructed to call chambers together on a conference call (303-335-2174) in order to schedule time for a prelimi nary injunction hearing. It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff is to submit briefing as to why this Court should grant a motion for a preliminary injunction by no later than 5:00 p.m. on March 7, 2015. Defendants are to submit a response no later than 5:00 p.m. on March 9, 2015. SO ORDERED BY Judge Christine M. Arguello on 3/3/2015.(shart)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Atlas Biologicals, Inc. v. Kutrubes et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Atlas Biologicals, Inc.
Represented By: John David Root
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Thomas James Kutrubes
Represented By: Kevin William Ward
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Peak Serum, Inc.
Represented By: Kevin William Ward
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Peak Serum, LLC
Represented By: Kevin William Ward
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?