Mishra v. Trani et al
| Bikram Mishra |
| Travis Trani and Cynthia Coffman |
| 1:2015cv00446 |
| March 3, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Fremont |
| Gordon P. Gallagher |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
32
FINAL JUDGMENT. re: 31 by clerk on 8/14/2015(dhans, )
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER TO SUPPLEMENT STATE COURT RECORD by Judge R. Brooke Jackson on 6/30/15. (jdyne, )
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER to Dismiss in Part and for Answer. Claim one of the Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (ECF No. 1 ) is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as procedurally defaulted. Respondents shall file an Answer to claims two and three of the Application within thirty (30) days of this Order. Applicant may file a Reply within thirty (30) days after Respondents file an Answer. By Judge R. Brooke Jackson on 06/03/2015. (athom, )
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER Drawing Case. This case shall be drawn to a presiding judge, or if appropriate, to a magistrate judge, by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 04/29/15. (nmarb, )
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER For State Court Record, by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 04/28/15. (nmarb, )
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER To Respondents to File Pre-Answer Response, by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 3/4/15. (nmarb, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
