Johnson v. Life Insurance Company of North America
| Julie Johnson |
| Life Insuance Company of North American |
| 1:2015cv00699 |
| April 3, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Douglas |
| Michael E. Hegarty |
| Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
68
ORDER AFFIRMING TERMINATION OF BENEFITS. ORDERED: 1. Plaintiff's Motion for Bench Trial on the Record 57 and the parties' Joint Motion for Determination 61 are GRANTED; 2.Johnson's Motion to Strike 66 is DENIED AS MOOT; 3 . Defendant's decision to terminate benefits is AFFIRMED; 4. The Clerk shall enter final judgment in favor of Defendant and against Plaintiff; and 5. The parties shall bear their own attorney's fees and costs, by Judge William J. Martinez on 3/28/2017. (dhans, )
|
|
Filing
44
MINUTE ORDER granting 42 Third Unopposed Motion to Modify Scheduling Order to Extend Briefing Schedule in this ERISA-Governed Insurance Dispute, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 4/14/2016. Adm Plaintiffs Brief due by 6/30/2016. (slibi, )
|
|
Filing
38
COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ENTRY for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty granting in part and denying in part 30 Motion to Compel; Motion Hearing held on 2/26/2016. The documents that are to be produced to Magistrate Judge Hegarty for in camera review are due on or before 3/15/2016. FTR: Courtroom A501. (mdave, )
|
|
Filing
28
MINUTE ORDER granting 26 Unopposed Motion to Modify Scheduling Order to Extend Briefing Schedule in this ERISA-Governed Insurance Dispute, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 1/19/2016. Adm Plaintiffs Brief due by 4/15/2016. (slibi, )
|
|
Filing
25
MINUTE ORDER granting 23 Unopposed Motion to Modify Scheduling Order to Extend Briefing Schedule in this ERISA-Governed Insurance Dispute, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 12/04/2015. Deadline for filing Plaintiffs Opening Brief due by 1/15/2016. Deadline for filing Defendants Response Brief: 30 days after filing of opening brief. Deadline for filing Plaintiffs Reply Brief: 15 days after filing of response brief.(slibi, )
|
|
Filing
22
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 11/20/2015. (mdave, )
|
|
Filing
21
MINUTE ORDER denying without prejudice 18 Motion for Entry of Stipulated Protective Order by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 11/3/2015.(mdave, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Johnson v. Life Insurance Company of North America | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Julie Johnson | |
| Represented By: | Shawn E. McDermott |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Life Insuance Company of North American | |
| Represented By: | Jack M. Englert, Jr. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
