Duncan et al v. Esquibel et al
| John Duncan, Dianna Harris and Dakota Duncan |
| Nate Esquibel (I), Roger Whinery (I) and Kevin Sturch (I) |
| 1:2015cv00759 |
| April 11, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Weld |
| Michael E. Hegarty |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
30
MINUTE ORDER granting in part and denying in part 29 Unopposed Motion to Stay Pending Deadlines; denying without prejudice 21 Combined Motion for Summary Judgment and Memorandum; denying without prejudice 23 Nate Esqibel's Motion for Sum mary Judgment Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P56(a); denying without prejudice 24 Roger Whinery's Motion for Summary Judgment Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P.56(a). Final Pretrial Conference set for 5/23/2016 is VACATED. Dismissal Papers due on or before 5/13/2016, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 4/11/2016.(slibi, )
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 04/01/2016. All claims that were or could have been brought by Plaintiff Dianna Harris against any or all Defendants are dismissed with prejudice, each party to pay his or her own costs and attorney fees. The Clerk of the Court is directed to drop Dianna Harris from the caption of this case. (mdave, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
