Beddingfield v. Brown et al
| Christopher Beddingfield |
| Christopher Brown, Drew Jeltes and City of Colorado Springs |
| 1:2015cv00846 |
| April 22, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| El Paso |
| Michael J. Watanabe |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
41
JUDGMENT by Clerk: in favor of City of Colorado Springs, Christopher Brown, Drew Jeltes against Christopher Beddingfield re: 40 Order Adopting Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. By Clerk on 3/18/16. (kfinn)
|
|
Filing
40
ORDER that the Report & Recommendation on Defendants' Motion To Dismiss 35 is Approved and Adopted as an Order of this Court AND Granting 23 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 3/17/2016.(cmira)
|
|
Filing
32
MINUTE ORDER granting 25 Defendants' Motion for Protective Order from Discovery and to Vacate the Scheduling Conference. Scheduling Conference 7/28/2015 10:30 AM is vacated. Proceedings in this case are STAYED. By Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 7/13/2015.(emill)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER Setting Scheduling/Planning Conference and Setting Deadline for Filing of Pilot Program Consent Form; Consent Form due by 6/11/2015. Scheduling Conference set for 6/25/2015 10:30 AM in Courtroom A 502 before Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe, by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 4/23/15. (morti, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
