Arndt et al v. City of Colorado Springs
Rebecca Arndt, Nicole Baldwin, Cathy Buckley, Stacey Clark, Donya Davis, Julie Garrett, Carolyn Graves, Samantha Lembergs, Jennifer Lewis, Geraldine Pring, Magdalena Santos and Terry Thrumston |
City of Colorado Springs |
1:2015cv00922 |
April 30, 2015 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Denver Office |
El Paso |
Richard P. Matsch |
Employment |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 156 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND ORDER Deciding Plaintiffs' Claim of Disparate Impact Discrimination, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 7/12/2017. (agarc, ) |
Filing 76 ORDER Granting 75 Plaintiffs motion to modify the Amended Scheduling Order to remove the limitation of ten depositions per side and to allow Plaintiffs to take up to 35 depositions. The limitation on the number of depositions which may be taken by Plaintiffs is stricken from Section 7 of the Amended Scheduling Order 59 , by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 4/7/16. (ktera) |
Filing 73 ORDER Denying 71 Plaintiff's Motion for Protective Order, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 3/17/16. (ktera) |
Filing 70 ORDER Denying 68 Motion to Dismiss, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 3/8/16. (ktera) |
Filing 65 ORDER Granting 64 Plaintiffs Unopposed Motion to File Second Amended Complaint, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 2/1/2016.(evana, ) |
Filing 53 ORDER This Court having granted the Joint Stipulated Motion for Preliminary Injunctive Relief 52 , the hearings scheduled for November 18, 2015, and November 23, 2015, are vacated, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 11/9/15. (ktera) |
Filing 49 MINUTE ORDER The November 18, 2015, preliminary injunction hearing is scheduled to commence at 8:30 a.m. in Courtroom A, Second Floor, the Byron White United States Courthouse, 1823 Stout Street, Denver, Colorado, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 10/26/15. (ktera) |
Filing 45 COURTROOM MINUTES for Motion Hearing held before Judge Richard P. Matsch on 10/22/2015. Denying 27 Human Performance Systems, Inc.'s Motion to Quash and/or Modify Subpoena. Parties shall proceed in accordance with the procedure Ms. Dell' Olio outlined. The information will be provided for attorneys' eyes only and will be coded. Denying 39 Defendant's Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction, as no brief is required. Def endant has up to and including 11/9/2015 to submit its expert report. Defendant's Oral Motion for Leave to Conduct Limited Discovery is denied. Preliminary Injunction Hearing is set for 11/23/2015 at 9:00 AM in Courtroom A before Judge Richard P. Matsch regarding motion 35 . Counsel shall be present at 8:30 AM. FTR: D. Hansen. (ebuch) |
Filing 43 ORDER Granting 42 Plaintiffs' Unopposed Motion to Amend Complaint. The Amended Complaint attached thereto is accepted for filing, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 10/20/15. (ktera) |
Filing 25 PROTECTIVE ORDER Between Plaintiffs and Human Performance Systems, Inc., by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 8/7/2015. (ebuch) |
Filing 8 ORDER Scheduling conference will be held on July 15, 2015, at 11:00 a.m. in the Conference Room, Second Floor, the Byron White United States Courthouse, 1823 Stout Street, Denver, Colorado. The proposed order (original only) on paper, shall be su bmitted directly to chambers by 4:00 p.m. on July 9, 2015. The conference is conducted with lead counsel present in person. No parties or representatives of parties will be permitted to attend, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 5/22/15. (ktera) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.