Five Star Chemicals & Supply, LLC v. 5 Star Enterprise, Inc
| Five Star Chemicals & Supply, LLC |
| 5 Star Enterprise, Inc doing business as 5 Star Chemicals |
| 1:2020cv02769 |
| September 14, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Raymond P Moore |
| Nina Y Wang |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 44 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER granting #10 Motion to Continue by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 11/10/2020. The Telephonic Scheduling Conference set for 11/16/2020 is VACATED and RESET for 1/26/2021 10:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang, with the Proposed Scheduling Order due 1/19/2021. All participants shall use the dial-in information as previously ordered. Text Only Entry(nywlc2, )
|
|
Filing 11
MEMORANDUM regarding #10 First MOTION to Continue Scheduling Conference filed by Five Star Chemicals & Supply, LLC. Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. By Judge Raymond P. Moore on 11/9/2020. (Text Only Entry) (rmsec )
|
|
Filing 10
First MOTION to Continue Scheduling Conference by Plaintiff Five Star Chemicals & Supply, LLC. (Kaider, Brian)
|
|
Filing 9
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Five Star Chemicals & Supply, LLC. 5 Star Enterprise, Inc served on 10/15/2020, answer due 11/5/2020. (Kaider, Brian)
|
|
Filing 8
MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 10/9/2020. Due to an unavoidable scheduling conflict, the Telephonic Scheduling Conference set for 11/16/2020 at 2:30 PM is hereby RESET in time only to 01:00 PM in Courtroom A 502 before Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. All participants shall use the following dial-in information: 888-363-4749, Access Code: 5738976#. Text Only Entry (nywlc1, )
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER Setting Rule 16(b) Scheduling Conference by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 9/21/20. Proposed Scheduling Order due by 11/9/2020. Telephonic Scheduling Conference set for 11/16/2020 02:30 PM before Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. (nmarb, )
|
|
Filing 6
MINUTE ORDER: With the assignment of this matter, the parties are advised that throughout this case they are expected to be familiar and comply with not only the Local Rules of this District, but also Judge Raymond P. Moore's Civil Practice Standards, which may be found at: http://www.cod.uscourts.gov/JudicialOfficers/ActiveArticleIIIJudges/HonRaymondPMoore.aspx. SO ORDERED by Judge Raymond P. Moore on 9/14/2020. (Text Only Entry) (rmsec )
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions, (4) conduct a pretrial conference and enter a pretrial order, and (5) conduct hearings, including evidentiary hearings, and submit proposed findings of fact and recommendations for rulings on dispositive motions. Court sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.6. On the recommendation or informal request of the magistrate judge or on the request of the parties by motion, this court may direct the parties to engage in an early neutral evaluation, a settlement conference, or another alternative dispute resolution proceeding. By Judge Raymond P. Moore on 9/14/2020. (Text Only Entry) (rmsec)
|
|
Filing 4
SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (jsalz, )
|
|
Filing 3
Report re Patent/Trademark: Report on the filing of an action emailed (NEF) to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (jsalz, )
|
|
Filing 2
Case assigned to Judge Raymond P. Moore and drawn to Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. Text Only Entry. (jsalz, )
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against 5 Star Enterprise, Inc. (Filing fee $ 400,Receipt Number 1082-7485068)Attorney Brian David Kaider added to party Five Star Chemicals & Supply, LLC(pty:pla), filed by Five Star Chemicals & Supply, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit, #7 Exhibit, #8 Exhibit, #9 Exhibit, #10 Exhibit, #11 Exhibit, #12 Exhibit, #13 Exhibit, #14 Exhibit, #15 Exhibit, #16 Civil Cover Sheet, #17 Summons)(Kaider, Brian)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Five Star Chemicals & Supply, LLC v. 5 Star Enterprise, Inc | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: 5 Star Enterprise, Inc doing business as 5 Star Chemicals | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Five Star Chemicals & Supply, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Brian David Kaider |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
