Cuesta v. SMT Holdings LLC et al
| Carlos Cuesta |
| SMT Holdings LLC, Donepudi Holdings LLC and Resolute Brewing Company LLC |
| 1:2021cv03094 |
| November 18, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Nina Y Wang |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12181 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
NOTICE of Firm name change by Defendant Resolute Brewing Company LLC (McLeod, Scott)
|
|
Filing 11
MINUTE ORDER: The Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Comply with the Court's Order #10 is hereby GRANTED. The Telephonic Scheduling Conference set for February 1, 2022 at 10:00 AM is RESET for March 8, 2022 at 09:30 AM. The Proposed Scheduling Order is due March 1, 2022. The Consent Form is due February 22, 2022. The Parties shall hold a pre-scheduling conference meeting and prepare a proposed Scheduling Order in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.1 and 26.1(a) on or before: 21 days prior to the Scheduling Conference. In addition, while Plaintiff filed the instant motion as "unopposed," there is no statement of conferral in the motion to indicate that Plaintiff's request was indeed unopposed. Plaintiff is reminded that he must comply with D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1 when filing a motion with this court. By Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 1/10/2022. Text Only Entry (nywlc3, )
|
|
Filing 10
Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to Comply with the Court's Order [D.E. 4] by Plaintiff Carlos Cuesta. (Perez, Anthony)
|
|
Filing 9
Resolute Brewing LLC's ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Resolute Brewing Company LLC.(McLeod, Scott)
|
|
Filing 8
CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. (McLeod, Scott)
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE of Entry of Appearance of Scott D. McLeod for Defendant by Scott David McLeod on behalf of Resolute Brewing Company LLCAttorney Scott David McLeod added to party Resolute Brewing Company LLC(pty:dft) (McLeod, Scott)
|
|
Filing 6
SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (alave, )
|
|
Filing 5
SUMMONS REQUEST as to Resolute Brewing Company, SMT Holdings, LLC., and Donepudi Holdings, LLC re #3 Magistrate Judge, #1 Complaint, by Plaintiff Carlos Cuesta. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(Perez, Anthony)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING/PLANNING CONFERENCE AND SETTING DEADLINE FOR FILING OF CONSENT/NONCONSENT FORM by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 11/18/2021. Consent Form due by 1/11/2022. Proposed Scheduling Order due 1/25/2022. Scheduling Conference set for 2/1/2022 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang, via telephone conference. All participants shall use the following dial-in information: 888-363-4749, Access Code: 5738976. (alave, )
|
|
Filing 3
Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1, direct assignment of civil actions to full time magistrate judges. No Summons Issued. Summons submitted has incorrect caption and not issued. Please file completed Summons for issuance using the event "Summons Request." (jcharl, )
|
|
Filing 2
Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang Text Only Entry. (jcharl, )
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Donepudi Holdings LLC, Resolute Brewing Co., SMT Holdings LLC (Filing fee $ 402,Receipt Number ACODC-8183610)Attorney Anthony J. Perez added to party Carlos Cuesta(pty:pla), filed by Carlos Cuesta. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons)(Perez, Anthony)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
