Doe et al v. Darien et al
| 3:2005cv00482 |
| March 18, 2005 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| New Haven Office |
| Warren W. Eginton |
| Holly B. Fitzsimmons |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
153
MEMORANDUM of DECISION granting in part and denying in part 138 Motion for Summary Judgment. The Court VACATES its prior 125 ruling granting summary judgment on the claims of intentional infliction of emotional distress and recklessness against Wilson. Signed by Judge Warren W. Eginton on 2/18/2010. (Simpson, T.)
|
|
Filing
125
MEMORANDUM of DECISION Granting in Part and Denying in Part 88 Aide Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment; Granting in Part and Denying in Part 89 Wilson's Motion for Summary Judgment; Granting in its entirety 90 Town Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment; Denying 111 Motion to Strike ; Denying 113 Motion to Strike ; Denying 122 Motion to Strike. Signed by Judge Warren W. Eginton on 2/11/2009. (D'Andrea, S.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Doe et al v. Darien et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
