In Re Charles Atwood Flanagan
Appellant: Titan RE Ventures LLC
Appellee: MJCC Realty LP
Case Number: 3:2007cv01379
Filed: September 14, 2007
Court: US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Office: New Haven Office
County: New Haven
Presiding Judge: Christopher F. Droney
Nature of Suit: Bankruptcy Appeal (801)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 31, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 32 MEMORANDUM OF DECISION affirming the decision of the Bankruptcy Court. Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 03/31/2009. (Penberthy, K.)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: In Re Charles Atwood Flanagan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellant: Titan RE Ventures LLC
Represented By: James M. Nugent
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellee: MJCC Realty LP
Represented By: Edward C. Taiman, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?