Sullivan et al v. Hyland et al
| Philip Sullivan and Charlotte Sullivan |
| James Hyland, Maryanne DeLisa, Gregory Zigmont, Charles Coffey, Terri Sonneman and John Malone |
| 3:2008cv00471 |
| March 31, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Civil Rights: Other Office |
| Hartford |
| Janet Bond Arterton |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| No cause code entered |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
57
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER. See attached document. For the reasons stated therein: documents 39 , 40 , and 55 , the Recommended Rulings issued by Magistrate Judge Margolis in this matter, are ADOPTED IN PART, as modified by the fore going opinion; the defendants' 21 , 24 , & 26 Motions To Dismiss are GRANTED; the plaintiffs' 36 & 48 Motions To Strike are DENIED; and defendants' 30 & 50 Motions for Injunctions are GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The Clerk of Court is instructed enter judgment for defendants, with prejudice and without costs, and to close the file. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on August 12, 2009. (Kleysteuber, R.)
|
|
Filing
55
RECOMMENDED RULING denying 48 MOTION to Strike filed by Charlotte Sullivan and Philip Sullivan and granting 50 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by Maryanne DeLisa. 4 Pages. Objections due by 2/24/2009. Signed by Judge Joan G. Margolis on 2/6/09. (Hill, M.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
