Book v. Mortgage Elec Registration Sys Inc et al
| Ethan Book, Jr. |
| Mortgage Elec Registration Sys Inc, Attorney's Title & Abstract Co Inc and John Centopani |
| 3:2008cv00821 |
| May 29, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Other Statutory Actions Office |
| Fairfield |
| Stefan R. Underhill |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| No cause code entered |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
56
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION granting 5 MOTION to Dismiss filed by John Centopani, granting 34 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Mortgage Elec Registration Sys Inc, denying as moot 43 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Local Rule 26(f) Report filed by Eth an Book, Jr., denying as moot 25 MOTION for Extension of Time filed by Mortgage Elec Registration Sys Inc, denying as moot 32 MOTION for Sanctions filed by Ethan Book, Jr., denying as moot 48 MOTION for Extension of Time to file a motion for su mmary judgment filed by Ethan Book, Jr., denying as moot 52 MOTION for Extension of Time filed by Ethan Book, Jr., denying as moot 23 MOTION to Amend/Correct filed by Attorney's Title & Abstract Co Inc, denying as moot 51 MOTION Supplement Plaintiff, denying as moot MOTION to Amend/Correct filed by Ethan Book, Jr., denying as moot 47 MOTION to Amend/Correct filed by Ethan Book, Jr. Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 3/26/09. (Candee, D.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
