Wise v. Cavalry Portfolio Svcs LLC
| Krista E. Wise |
| Cavalry Portfolio Svcs LLC |
| 3:2009cv00086 |
| January 20, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Consumer Credit Office |
| New Haven |
| Charles S. Haight, Jr. |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 15:1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
99
ORDER (see attached) concerning Class Certification, Notice and Scheduling. The parties are directed to take notice of the deadlines entered by the Court at paragraphs 1, 2, 5, and 6 of the Order. Counsel shall appear before the Court for a hearing on this matter on Wednesday, September 18, 2013, at 11:00 A.M. in the Connecticut Financial Center, 17th Floor, 157 Church Street, New Haven, Connecticut. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on April 10, 2013. (Dorais, L.)
|
|
Filing
86
RULING granting 60 Motion to Compel; denying 60 Motion for Attorney's Fees. See attached Ruling. Defendant is ordered to comply with the subject request for production and serve the requested documents on Plaintiff no later than June 4, 2012. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr on May 7, 2012. Caldwell, M.)
|
|
Filing
71
ORDER denying 56 Defendant's Motion for Decertification of FDCPA Class. The parties' joint application to decertify the CUTPA class is also DENIED, without prejudice to a renewal by Plaintiffs, which must be filed and served not later than February 21, 2012, failing which the ruling on the CUTPA class becomes final. See attached Ruling on Defendant's Motion to Decertify Class. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr on February 6, 2012. (Caldwell, M.)
|
|
Filing
41
RULING (see attached) granting 26 Plaintiff's Motion to Certify Class. Krista Wise is appointed as class representative. Daniel S. Blinn and Joanne S. Faulkner are appointed as class counsel. The class is defined in the Ruling. The parties a re ordered to confer and to jointly file with the Court a proposed schedule for this case going forward, which shall be due within fourteen days of this Ruling. In the interim, any prior scheduling-related orders are no longer binding. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on September 15, 2010. (Lacedonia, J.)
|
|
Filing
40
ORDER (see attached) denying 19 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Count Two. The deadlines set in the Court's scheduling order of January 6, 2010 37 shall not begin to run until the Court decides the Motion to Certify Class 26 , which remains pending. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on March 30, 2010. (Lacedonia, J.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Wise v. Cavalry Portfolio Svcs LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Krista E. Wise | |
| Represented By: | Joanne S. Faulkner |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Cavalry Portfolio Svcs LLC | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
