PHC Castor N.V. v. Stewart

Defendant: William P. Stewart, III
Plaintiff: PHC Castor N.V.
Case Number: 3:2012cv00445
Filed: March 23, 2012
Court: Connecticut District Court
Office: New Haven Office
County: XX Outside US
Presiding Judge: Robert N. Chatigny
Nature of Suit: Negotiable Instrument
Cause of Action: 28:1332
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
June 19, 2013 68 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER granting in part 28 Motion for Prejudgment Remedy; granting 29 Motion for Disclosure. Signed by Judge Donna F. Martinez on 6/19/13. (Nichols, J.)
September 20, 2013 90 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER finding as moot 70 Motion to Quash; granting 77 Motion to Compel; granting 82 Motion to Compel; denying without prejudice 82 Motion for Sanctions. Signed by Judge Donna F. Martinez on 9/20/13. (Nichols, J.)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: PHC Castor N.V. v. Stewart
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: William P. Stewart, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: PHC Castor N.V.
Represented By: Melvin A. Simon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.