Lima LS plc v. PHL Variable Insurance Company et al
| Lima LS plc |
| PHL Variable Insurance Company, Phoenix Life Insurance Company, Phoenix Companies, Inc., James D. Wehr, Philip K. Polkinghorn, Edward W. Cassidy, Dona D. Young and Does |
| 3:2012cv01122 |
| August 2, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| New Haven Office |
| XX Outside US |
| Warren W. Eginton |
| Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 1962 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
203
RULING denying 181 Motion to Compel Responses to Interrogatory Nos. 3 and 4 and Related Document Production. Signed by Judge Holly B. Fitzsimmons on 3/16/2015. (Katz, Samantha)
|
|
Filing
165
RULING on Plaintiff's First Requests for Production Nos. 60 and 61 and Second Request for Production No. 33. 6 pages. Signed by Judge Holly B. Fitzsimmons on 10/22/14.(Esposito, A.)
|
|
Filing
157
RULING on Plaintiff's First Requests for Production Nos. 53-55. 8 pages. Signed by Judge Holly B. Fitzsimmons on 10/6/14.(Esposito, A.)
|
|
Filing
149
RULING/ORDER Re: July 15, 2014, Conference. Signed by Judge Holly B. Fitzsimmons on 7/30/14.(Esposito, A.)
|
|
Filing
135
RULING/ORDER RE: May 7, 2014, CONFERENCE. See Ruling Attached. The next case management conference will be held on June 16, 2014 at 10:30AM. Signed by Judge Holly B. Fitzsimmons on 5/15/14.(Esposito, A.)
|
|
Filing
122
DISCOVERY ORDER dated February 20, 2014. Signed by Judge Holly B. Fitzsimmons on 2/20/14.(Esposito, A.)
|
|
Filing
76
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 35 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint. The Court GRANTS the motion to dismiss as to the alleged violations of Connecticut General Statutes § 35-28 and the claim of common law conspiracy, wh ich are dismissed with prejudice. The Court GRANTS the motion to dismiss as to the RICO and common law fraud claims, which are dismissed without prejudice. The Court DENIES the motion to dismiss as to the alleged violations of Connecticut General St atutes § 35-27, although the allegations that defendants' litigation constitutes exclusionary conduct are dismissed. The Court also DENIES the motion to dismiss the claim of CUTPA violation. Within thirty days of this Rulings filing date, plaintiff should file an amended complaint consistent with this Ruling. Signed by Judge Warren W. Eginton on 7/1/13. (Ladd-Smith, I.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
