Ghawi v. Law firm Howard L. Schiff, P.C. et al

Plaintiff: Nabil Ghawi
Defendant: Law firm Howard L. Schiff, P.C., Jeanine M. Dumont, Heath A. Tiberio, Rebecca Jadach and Quaneshia Dailey-Thompson
Case Number: 3:2013cv00115
Filed: January 24, 2013
Court: Connecticut District Court
Office: New Haven Office
County: Fairfield
Presiding Judge: Janet Bond Arterton
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15:1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
December 1, 2014 63 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER: Defendants' Motion 60 to Dismiss is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The following claims are dismissed in their entirety: (1) 47 U.S.C. § 227(e); (2) TILA, 15 U.S.C. § 1643(b); (3) Mail Fraud, 18 U.S.C. § 1341; (4) &q uot;Unconscionability"; (5) "Misconduct"; (6) C.G.S. § 16-256e; (7) RICO, 18 U.S.C. § 1961 et seq.; (8) FDCPA, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1692b(1) & (3), 1692e(2), and 1692f(1); (9) Connecticut TILA, C.G.S. § 36a-681; and ( 10) C.G.S. § 42-288a. In addition, all claims under the FDCPA and CUTPA are dismissed as to Defendant Citibank. The remaining claims-(1) FDCPA, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1692c(a)(1), 1692d(5) & (6), 1692e(10), and 1692g(b) as to HLS and HLS employees; (2) TCPA, 47 U.S.C. § 227(b) as to all Defendants; and (3) CUTPA, C.G.S. § 42-110 et seq. as to HLS and HLS employees-are not dismissed. Signed by Judge Janet Bond Arterton on 12/1/14. (Harris, J)
May 18, 2015 96 Opinion or Order of the Court RULING (see attached) denying in large part 78 Defendant Citibank's Motion for Protective Order; granting in part 80 Plaintiff's Motion to Compel; granting in part and denying in part 85 Plaintiff's Motion for Compliance by the HLS Defendants; and granting in part 90 Plaintiff's Second Motion to Compel. Signed by Judge Joan G. Margolis on 5/18/2015. (Watson, M.)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ghawi v. Law firm Howard L. Schiff, P.C. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nabil Ghawi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Law firm Howard L. Schiff, P.C.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jeanine M. Dumont
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Heath A. Tiberio
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rebecca Jadach
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Quaneshia Dailey-Thompson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.