Kaye et al v. Amicus Mediation & Arbitration Group, Inc. et al
| Roger H. Kaye, MD PC and Roger H. Kaye |
| Amicus Mediation & Arbitration Group, Inc. and Hillary Earle |
| 3:2013cv00347 |
| March 14, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| New Haven Office |
| Fairfield |
| Janet C. Hall |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
116
RULING denying 115 Motion for Certificate of Appealability. Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 10/29/2014. (Malone, P.) Modified on 10/30/2014 to mark as opinion.(Malone, P.).
|
|
Filing
113
RULING denying re 90 MOTION for Reconsideration filed by Amicus Mediation & Arbitration Group, Inc., Hillary Earle, denying 92 MOTION to Stay filed by Amicus Mediation & Arbitration Group, Inc., Hillary Earle. Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 10/10/2014. (Malone, P.)
|
|
Filing
89
AMENDED RULING denying 58 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction; granting 60 Motion to Certify Class Class A and subclasses of Classes B and C are hereby CERTIFIED as defined in ruling. Lead plaintiffs Roger H. Kaye and Roger H. Kaye, MC PC are hereby APPOINTED as class representives of each class. Plaintiffs' counsel Attorneys Aytan Y. Bellin and Roger Furman are hereby APPOINTED as class counsel for each of the three classes. Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 5/28/2014.(Malone, P.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
