Smith v. Connecticut Packaging Materials Inc

Plaintiff: Lorinda Smith
Defendant: Connecticut Packaging Materials Inc
Case Number: 3:2013cv00550
Filed: April 18, 2013
Court: Connecticut District Court
Office: New Haven Office
County: Hartford
Presiding Judge: Vanessa L. Bryant
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 29:621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
January 16, 2015 48 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER granting Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. # 35 ). Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 1/16/2015. (Ramesh, S)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Smith v. Connecticut Packaging Materials Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lorinda Smith
Represented By: H. P. Sean Dweck
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Connecticut Packaging Materials Inc
Represented By: Charles Scott Schwefel
Represented By: Mark S. Shipman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.