ValleCastro v. Tobin,Melien & Marohn et al
Brunilda ValleCastro |
Tobin, Melien & Marohn, William L. Marohn, Joseph M. Tobin, Jack Kendrick, Kathleen A. Johnson and Gabriela Vivian |
3:2013cv01441 |
September 30, 2013 |
US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
New Haven Office |
Hartford |
Stefan R. Underhill |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 126 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 118 Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement. In accordance the dates provided in this Order, the Clerk shall administratively close this case without prejudice to reopening within 45 days of this order if any term of this Order has not been met. Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 7/10/2017. (Buttrick, A.) |
Filing 82 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 62 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 10/27/2015. (Buttrick, A.) |
Filing 55 ORDER granting 15 Motion for Judicial Notice; granting in part and denying in part 25 Motion to Strike Affirmative Defenses; denying 25 Motion for a More Definite Statement; granting with prejudice 26 Motion to Dismiss claims against defe ndant Vivian; granting without prejudice to ValleCastro amending her complaint 26 Motion to Dismiss claims against defendant Kendrick; and granting 47 Motion to Amend/Correct 1 Complaint. An amended complaint, if any, shall be filed by January 31, 2015. Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 12/16/2014. (Pannu, C.) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.