Jennette v. Housing Authority of the City of Bridgeport

Justia Dockets & Filings Second Circuit Connecticut District Court Jennette v. Housing Authority of the City of Bridgeport

Jennette v. Housing Authority of the City of Bridgeport

Plaintiff:	Linda Jennette
Defendant:	Housing Authority of the City of Bridgeport
Case Number:	3:2013cv01500
Filed:	October 15, 2013
Court:	US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Office:	New Haven Office
County:	Fairfield
Presiding Judge:	Michael P. Shea
Nature of Suit:	Employment
Cause of Action:	29 U.S.C. § 791
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
May 18, 2015	Filing 26 ORDER. For the reasons set forth in the attached ruling, the 20 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. The case proceeds only as to the plaintiff's claim that the defendant discriminated against her on the basis of her disability when it terminated her employment.The parties' joint trial memorandum is due September 1, 2015, and jury selection is scheduled for November 4, 2015. If the parties wish to engage in a mediation with a magistrate judge, they shoul d jointly file a statement on or before May 26, 2015, certifying that (1) counsel have conferred with their clients and each other, (2) the parties wish to proceed to mediation, (3) the parties are willing to participate in settlement efforts in good faith, and (4) counsel believe that a mediation stands at least a reasonable chance of resolving the case without trial. Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 5/18/2015. (Luedeman, R.)

Date Filed

Document Text

May 18, 2015

Filing 26 ORDER. For the reasons set forth in the attached ruling, the 20 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. The case proceeds only as to the plaintiff's claim that the defendant discriminated against her on the basis of her disability when it terminated her employment.The parties' joint trial memorandum is due September 1, 2015, and jury selection is scheduled for November 4, 2015. If the parties wish to engage in a mediation with a magistrate judge, they shoul d jointly file a statement on or before May 26, 2015, certifying that (1) counsel have conferred with their clients and each other, (2) the parties wish to proceed to mediation, (3) the parties are willing to participate in settlement efforts in good faith, and (4) counsel believe that a mediation stands at least a reasonable chance of resolving the case without trial. Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 5/18/2015. (Luedeman, R.)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jennette v. Housing Authority of the City of Bridgeport
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Linda Jennette
Represented By:	Thomas W. Bucci
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Housing Authority of the City of Bridgeport
Represented By:	Warren L. Holcomb
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?