Lewis v. Maldonado et al
| Prince Lewis |
| George Byrd, Dan Bennett and John DeFeo |
| 3:2014cv00437 |
| April 4, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| New Haven Office |
| Tolland |
| Michael P. Shea |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
69
ORDER. As set forth in the attached ruling, Plaintiff's motions for 66 ruling and 68 extension of time to file default judgment are DENIED. Plaintiff's 67 motion for extension of time to respond to Defendants' motion to dismiss or judgment on the pleadings is GRANTED; Plaintiff shall respond to such motion on or before July 9, 2015. Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 5/19/15. (Khan, J)
|
|
Filing
59
ORDER. As set forth in the attached ruling, Plaintiff's 50 Motion for Leave to Amend and 51 Motion to Locate are DENIED. Plaintiff's 54 Motion for Extension is GRANTED; Plaintiff shall file a notice containing defendant DeFeo's service address within 30 days from the date of this order. Failure to timely file the notice will result in dismissal of all claims against defendant DeFeo. In addition, Plaintiff's 52 Motion for Default Entry is GRANTED, and the Clerk is dir ected to enter the default of defendants Bennett and Byrd. Plaintiff shall file a motion for default judgment within 21 days from the date of this order. Finally, Defendants' 53 Motion for Extension is DENIED. Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 5/1/15. (Khan, J)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
