Hubert v. Corrections et al
Plaintiff: Sharone Hubert
Defendant: Department of Corrections, Kyle Godding, Michael Davis and Kevin Curry
Case Number: 3:2014cv00476
Filed: April 4, 2014
Court: US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Office: New Haven Office
County: New Haven
Presiding Judge: Warren W. Eginton
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 30, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 144 ORDER granting 121 Motion for Summary Judgment; finding as moot 126 Motion to Dismiss; finding as moot 141 Motion to Consolidate Cases; finding as moot Motion for Reconsideration. The Clerk of the Court is instructed to enter judgment in favor of the State of Connecticut Department of Correction, Kyle Godding, Michael Davis, Kevin Curry, Derrick Austin, and Cicero Callender and close this case. Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 3/30/2018. (Riegel, J.)
November 15, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 109 ORDER. In light of Plaintiff's repeated failure to meet deadlines and comply with the orders of the Court throughout the history of this case, the Court declines to consider the nunc pro tunc 108 Response,, filed by Sharone Hubert. Plaintiff is given notice that the Court will not consider any future filing by Plaintiff that does not comply with the Courts deadlines. Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 11/15/2016. (Chen, C.)
February 22, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 67 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 40 Motion to Dismiss; finding as moot 44 Motion to Stay. Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 2/22/2016. (Shin, D.)
January 12, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 65 ORDER denying 45 Motion to Preclude Litigation Until Counsel Pays Costs Owed State; denying 63 Motion for Order. Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 1/12/2016. (Shin, D.)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hubert v. Corrections et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sharone Hubert
Represented By: Richard C. Gordon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Department of Corrections
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kyle Godding
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kevin Curry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?