Hubert v. Corrections et al
Sharone Hubert |
Department of Corrections, Kyle Godding, Michael Davis and Kevin Curry |
3:2014cv00476 |
April 4, 2014 |
US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
New Haven Office |
New Haven |
Warren W. Eginton |
Employment |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 144 ORDER granting 121 Motion for Summary Judgment; finding as moot 126 Motion to Dismiss; finding as moot 141 Motion to Consolidate Cases; finding as moot Motion for Reconsideration. The Clerk of the Court is instructed to enter judgment in favor of the State of Connecticut Department of Correction, Kyle Godding, Michael Davis, Kevin Curry, Derrick Austin, and Cicero Callender and close this case. Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 3/30/2018. (Riegel, J.) |
Filing 109 ORDER. In light of Plaintiff's repeated failure to meet deadlines and comply with the orders of the Court throughout the history of this case, the Court declines to consider the nunc pro tunc 108 Response,, filed by Sharone Hubert. Plaintiff is given notice that the Court will not consider any future filing by Plaintiff that does not comply with the Courts deadlines. Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 11/15/2016. (Chen, C.) |
Filing 67 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 40 Motion to Dismiss; finding as moot 44 Motion to Stay. Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 2/22/2016. (Shin, D.) |
Filing 65 ORDER denying 45 Motion to Preclude Litigation Until Counsel Pays Costs Owed State; denying 63 Motion for Order. Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 1/12/2016. (Shin, D.) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.