Li et al v. Colonial BT LLC
Ming Li and Wenjun Shan |
Colonial BT LLC |
3:2014cv00999 |
July 11, 2014 |
US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
New Haven Office |
XX Outside US |
Charles S. Haight |
Other Personal Injury |
No cause code entered |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 36 RULING (see attached) granting 17 Defendant's Motion for A More Definite Statement. Plaintiffs shall file and serve a second amended complaint, separating their nuisance claims into individual counts, setting forth factual allegations supporting their elements, and labeling said claims, on or before October 19, 2015. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on September 28, 2015.(Dorais, L.) |
Filing 6 ORDER (see attached) directing all parties to file and serve on or before August 22, 2014, affidavits regarding citizenship for federal diversity jurisdiction purposes. Because Defendant Colonial BT, LLC ("Colonial") has made no appe arance in this action as of this date, Plaintiffs' counsel is directed to serve a copy of this Order upon Defendant Colonial by certified mail at the same address at which Plaintiffs served the Summons and Complaint in this action. All case dea dlines are stayed pending the Courts review of the affidavits. If the Court determines that it possesses subject matter jurisdiction, the action may proceed. Otherwise, in the absence of such jurisdiction, the Court will dismiss the action. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on July 21, 2014.(Dorais, L.) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.