Whitnum v. Greenwich et al
| L. "Lee" Whitnum |
| Town of Greenwich and Greenwich Police Dept |
| 3:2014cv01183 |
| August 14, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| New Haven Office |
| Fairfield |
| Stefan R. Underhill |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 241 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
39
ORDER granting 29 Motion for Reconsideration and denying 30 Motion for Sanctions: The 23 Order granting Security for Costs is vacated, and the defendants' 22 Motion for Security for Costs is denied without prejudice. Whitnum's 30 Motion for Sanctions is also denied. Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 6/22/2015. (Pannu, C.)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER: The parties shall file a Form 26(f) report within 20 days of the date of this order, along with a written statement signed by all counsel of record explaining why sanctions should not be imposed for the parties failure to comply with Local Rule 26(f)(1). Failure to comply with this order will result in dismissal of the complaint. Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 4/17/2015. (Pannu, C.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
