Ramos v. GoAuto Centers of Meriden, LLC
Plaintiff: Pedro Ramos, III
Defendant: GoAuto Centers of Meriden, LLC
Case Number: 3:2015cv00314
Filed: March 3, 2015
Court: US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Office: New Haven Office
County: New Haven
Presiding Judge: Jeffrey A. Meyer
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1601
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 23, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT JUDGMENT. Plaintiff's motion for default judgment (Doc. # 10 ) is GRANTED. See attached ruling. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 12/23/2016. (Gruber, Sarah)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ramos v. GoAuto Centers of Meriden, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Pedro Ramos, III
Represented By: Daniel S. Blinn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: GoAuto Centers of Meriden, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?