Lamberty et al v. Connecticut State Police Union et al
| Marc Lamberty, Joseph Mercer, Carson Konow and Collin Konow |
| Connecticut State Police Union, Kevin Lembo, Benjamin Barnes, Lisa Grasso Egan and Sandra Fae Brown-Brewton |
| 3:2015cv00378 |
| March 14, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| New Haven Office |
| Hartford |
| Victor A. Bolden |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
238
ORDER denying 203 Motion for Reconsideration; granting 216 Motion to Dismiss; granting 226 Motion to Dismiss; denying 237 Motion for Attorney Fees. For the reasons explained in the attached ruling and order, the Court GRANTS the State Defendants' and the State Police Union's motions to dismiss. The Court also DENIES Plaintiffs' motions for reconsideration and to modify their request for attorneys' fees to include additional fees incurred since last filing. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to enter judgment for Defendants and close this case. Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 03/26/2021. (Millat, C.)
|
|
Filing
202
RULING denying 183 Motion for Attorney's Fees: For the reasons explained in the attached Ruling on Motion for Attorney's Fees and Expenses, the Court DENIES Plaintiffs' motion for attorney's fees and costs. Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 9/6/2019. (Baran, Hugh)
|
|
Filing
182
RULING AND ORDER denying 162 Motion for Summary Judgment. For the reasons explained in the attached Order, Plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment is DENIED without prejudice to renewal in the event there is an effort to reintroduce agency fee s and to the extent the Plaintiffs have not been adequately reimbursed for past agency fees already imposed. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to administratively close this case.If Plaintiffs wish to move for an award of attorneys f ees and costs, they are directed to do so by November 16, 2018. The State Defendants and the State Police Union may file any opposition by December 14, 2018, with any reply to the opposition due by December 28, 2018. Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 10/19/2018. (Baran, Hugh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
