Doe v. Torrington Board Of Education et al
Plaintiff: John Doe
Defendant: Torrington Board Of Education, Cheryl Kloczko, Joanne Creedon, Charles McSpirit, Daniel Dunaj, Johannah Dezurik, Gerald Carbone and James Dziekan
Case Number: 3:2015cv00452
Filed: March 27, 2015
Court: US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Office: New Haven Office
County: Litchfield
Presiding Judge: Michael P. Shea
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 14, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 204 ORDER. The attached document sets forth the Court's rulings on the Defendants' objections to the Plaintiff's trial exhibits. Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 2/14/2019. (Guevremont, Nathan)
September 20, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 159 ORDER. For the reasons stated in the attached, Plaintiff's 142 motion for sanctions is DENIED and Defendants' 137 motion for summary judgment is DENIED. Plaintiff's 153 motion to seal exhibits is GRANTED.The joint trial m emorandum is due in 45 days. However, should the parties jointly file a statement, within the next 14 days, in which they certify that (1) counsel have conferred with their clients and each other, (2) the parties wish to proceed to mediation, (3) th e parties are willing to participate in settlement efforts at such mediation in good faith, and (4) counsel believe that mediation stands at least a reasonable chance of resolving the case without trial, the Court will refer the case for mediation and postpone the deadline for filing the joint trial memorandum until 45 days after the conclusion of the mediation (should it be unsuccessful). Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 9/20/2018. (Guevremont, Nathan)
August 7, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 125 ORDER. For the reasons set forth herein, Dunaj and McKenna's amended motion to dismiss 95 is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Their initial motion to dismiss 94 is DENIED as moot. The remaining defendants' motion to dismiss 96 is G RANTED in part and DENIED in part. Doe's claims of intentional infliction of emotional distress against Gerard Carbone, Joanne Creedon, Johanna DeZurik, James Dziekan, Cheryl Kloczko, Michael McKenna, and Charles McSpiritt are dismissed. The cas e may proceed as to the substantive due process claim under a theory of state created danger against Dunaj (Count One), the negligence claims against all defendants (Counts Two, Three, and Five), and the intentional infliction of emotional distress claim against Dunaj (Count Four). Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 8/7/17. (Tegeler, D.)
November 17, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 90 ORDER. For the reasons set forth herein, the motion for reconsideration and request for permission to file a second amended complaint 79 is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Doe shall file an amended complaint within 21 days of this Order, incorp orating, as relevant, the newly discovered evidence described in his motion for reconsideration. With regard to the previously dismissed federal claims (Counts One through Seven of the first amended complaint), Doe may replead only the portion of Cou nt One that sets forth a substantive due process claim against Defendant Daniel Dunaj based on a theory of state-created danger. Doe may also replead any or all of the state law claims (Counts Eight through Fourteen of the first amended complaint), o ver which the Court had previously declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction in light of the dismissal of the federal claims. See 28 U.S.C. § 1367. Defendants will then have 21 days to respond. Also, within 30 days of this order, t he parties shall file a joint status report regarding the state of discovery and proposed revisions to the scheduling order in light of the re-opening of the case, including proposed deadlines for completing discovery, filing dispositive motions, and filing the joint trial memorandum. Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 11/17/16. (Tegeler, D.)
March 30, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 75 ORDER. As set forth herein, the Court GRANTS Defendants' motions 23 and 28 to dismiss. The Court DENIES the Motion 70 to Quash and the Motion 74 for Extension of Time as moot. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment dismissing this case. Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 3/30/16. (Bradley, K.)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Doe v. Torrington Board Of Education et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: John Doe
Represented By: Elizabeth Knight Adams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Torrington Board Of Education
Represented By: Nicole D. Dorman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cheryl Kloczko
Represented By: Nicole D. Dorman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Joanne Creedon
Represented By: Nicole D. Dorman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Charles McSpirit
Represented By: Nicole D. Dorman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Daniel Dunaj
Represented By: Thomas R. Gerarde
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Johannah Dezurik
Represented By: Nicole D. Dorman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Gerald Carbone
Represented By: Nicole D. Dorman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: James Dziekan
Represented By: Nicole D. Dorman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?