Ice Cube Building, LLC v. Scottsdale Insurance Company
| Ice Cube Building, LLC |
| Scottsdale Insurance Company |
| Scottsdale Insurance Company |
| Ice Cube Building, LLC |
| 3:2017cv00973 |
| June 13, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| New Haven Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Victor A. Bolden |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
112
RULING granting 106 First MOTION to Compel Responses to Deposition Questions. Signed by Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam on 5/31/2019. (Katz, S.)
|
|
Filing
104
ORDER granting 62 Motion to Quash; granting 62 Motion for Protective Order. See attached Order. Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 4/8/19. (Dooley, Kari)
|
|
Filing
102
ORDER granting 59 Motion to Preclude the Supplemental Expert Report of Dr. Hall. See attached Memorandum. Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 4/5/19. (Dooley, Kari)
|
|
Filing
82
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 61 Motion for Protective Order. See attached order. Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 2/11/2019. (Bempong, Tracy)
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER denying 21 Motion to Compel Arbitration. The Clerk of the Court is instructed to amend the caption in this case to name Defendant as Scottsdale Insurance Company. Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 6/18/2018. (Riegel, J.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
