Rizvi et al v. Urstadt Biddle Prop Inc et al
| Nusrat Rizvi and Eileen Rizvi |
| Urstadt Biddle Prop Inc, Willing L. Biddle, Tibbetts, Keating & Butler, Mario D. Cometti, Hinckley, Allen & Snyder LLP, Noble F. Allen, Coles Baldwin & Kaiser, LLC, John B. Kaiser, Antonio C. Robaina and Spa Thea, LLC |
| 3:2017cv01410 |
| August 21, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| New Haven Office |
| Fairfield |
| Victor A. Bolden |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1391 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
86
ORDER granting 78 Motion to Dismiss and RULING and ORDER on DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND CROSS MOTIONS for SANCTIONS. Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 09/28/18. (Ryan, Sarah)
|
|
Filing
62
ORDER granting 41 Defendant Antonio Robaina's Motion to Dismiss. Given the doctrine of judicial immunity, it is unlikely that further amendment would be productive. Accordingly the claims against Mr. Robaina are dismissed with prejudice. Se e Lucente v. Int'l Bus. Machines Corp., 310 F.3d 243, 258 (2d Cir. 2002) (Where it appears that granting leave to amend is unlikely to be productive... it is not an abuse of discretion to deny leave to amend.) (citing Ruffolo v. Oppenheimer & Co., 987 F.2d 129, 131 (2d Cir. 1993)). Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 1/17/2018. (Giammatteo, J.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
