Matias v. Chapdelaine et al
| Joel Matias |
| C. Chapdelaine, Mark Silver, R. Weldon, Anderson and Ogando |
| 3:2018cv00017 |
| January 3, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| New Haven Office |
| Hartford |
| Stefan R. Underhill |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
163
ORDER granting 132 Defendant Anderson's motion for summary judgment. The remaining state law claim against Silver is dismissed without prejudice to refiling in state court. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of Anderson and close this case. The Clerk is instructed to allow doc. no. 161 to remain pending, so it may be ruled on at a later date. Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 9/29/2022. (Guerrier, C.)
|
|
Filing
54
ORDER denying 47 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 02/10/2020. (Rosenberg, J.)
|
|
Filing
38
ORDER denying as moot 33 Motion to Compel; denying as moot 34 Motion for Default Entry 55(a); denying 25 Motion to Dismiss; denying 26 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Stefan R Underhill on 10/30/18. (Kaas, E.)
|
|
Filing
7
INITIAL REVIEW ORDER: Discovery due by 9/13/2018, Dispositive Motions due by 10/15/2018. Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 2/12/18. (Kaas, E.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
