Lombardo v. R.L. Young, INC.
| Don Lombardo |
| R.L. Young, INC., Raymond Young and Linda Young |
| 3:2018cv00188 |
| February 1, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| New Haven Office |
| Hartford |
| Janet Bond Arterton |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
120
ORDER granting 97 Motion for Summary Judgment by DND and Mr. Lombardo and granting 99 Motion for Summary Judgment by R.L. Young, Inc. Signed by Judge Janet Bond Arterton on 6/11/20. (Gutierrez, A.)
|
|
Filing
88
RULING granting in part and denying in part [Doc. No. 82] Motion to Compel. Signed by Judge Robert M. Spector on 9/6/2019. (Watson, M.)
|
|
Filing
81
ORDER: For the reasons set forth in the attached Ruling, DND Construction Services, LLC's Motion to Amend/Correct 72 is DENIED. Signed by Judge Janet Bond Arterton on 7/18/19. (Kolker, J.)
|
|
Filing
56
ORDER: For the reasons set forth in the attached Ruling, the Individual Defendants' 35 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED as to them only and Defendant's 19 Motion for Cost and Fees is GRANTED with modification, with the award of costs and fees to be determined upon Defendant's production of its fee documentation. This documentation shall be filed by January 21, 2019, with any response by Plaintiff due February 4, 2019. Signed by Judge Janet Bond Arterton on 12/21/2018. (Kolker, J.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
