RMH Tech LLC et al v. PMC Industries, Inc.
| RMH TECH LLC and Metal Roof Innovations, Ltd. |
| PMC Industries, Inc. |
| PMC Industries, Inc. |
| Metal Roof Innovations, Ltd. and RMH TECH LLC |
| 3:2018cv00543 |
| March 30, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| New Haven Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Victor A. Bolden |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 145 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
222
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER: For the reasons discussed in the attached Memorandum of Decision and Order, the Court finds that PMC directly infringed the 629 Patent, and that Plaintiffs are entitled to a permanent injunction. Accordingly, the Cou rt ORDERS that PMC be permanently enjoined from making, using, offering for sale, or selling in the United States the ColorSnap system, replacement parts to repair previously sold ColorSnap systems, or any colorable imitations thereof, until May 17, 2019--the date on which the 629 Patent will expire. The Court does not, however, find this case exceptional and does not award Plaintiffs attorneys fees and costs. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment for Plaintiffs and close this case. The Court shall retain jurisdiction of this case for the purpose of enforcing the terms of the permanent injunction. Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 12/18/2018.(Baran, Hugh)
|
|
Filing
179
RULING AND ORDER granting 163 Motion in Limine; denying 159 Motion in Limine, 160 Motion in Limine, and 161 Motion in Limine. As explained in the attached Ruling and Order, Plaintiffs' motion in limine is GRANTED and PMC's motions i n limine regarding the Kovacs Patent and Willful Infringement are DENIED. PMC's motion to preclude evidence related to the doctrine of equivalents is DENIED, but the Court may ultimately exclude any opinions offered at trial by Mr. Haddock that were not sufficiently disclosed to PMC. Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 10/19/2018. (Baran, Hugh)
|
|
Filing
176
ORDER on Caroll Marston. For the reasons stated in the attached order, the Court exercises its inherent authority to ensure the expeditious resolution of this case, Dietz v. Bouldin, 136 S. Ct. 1885, 1889 (2016), and grants RMH and MRI leave to take Mr. Marston's deposition before the upcoming trial. Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 10/17/2018. (Baran, Hugh)
|
|
Filing
158
ORDER denying 137 Motion for Summary Judgment; finding as moot 134 Motion to Amend/Correct in light of 135 Amended Scheduling Order. Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 8/6/2018. (Riegel, J.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
