Mahmud v. Saul
Saba Mahmud |
Andrew M. Saul |
Social Security Administration |
3:2019cv01666 |
October 23, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
Sarah A L Merriam |
Stefan R Underhill |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 23, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 10 CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge by Saba Mahmud, Andrew M. Saul. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam. This matter has been transferred to a magistrate judge. All non-efiled submissions should be filed at the seat of court where the magistrate judge presides. The case number will remain the same, but must be followed by the magistrate judge's initials. Signed by Judge Stefan R Underhill on 12/3/2019.(Anastasio, F.) |
Filing 9 NOTICE by Saba Mahmud Consent to USMJ Jurisdiction (Yelner, Olia) |
![]() |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Ariella Renee Zoltan on behalf of Andrew M. Saul (Zoltan, Ariella) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Saba Mahmud. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(Yelner, Olia) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Andrew M. Saul, filed by Saba Mahmud.(Yelner, Olia) Modified on 10/23/2019 to correct filed against parties (Hushin, Z.). |
Answer deadline updated for Saba Mahmud to 12/23/2019. (Fazekas, J.) |
Judge Stefan R Underhill and Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam added. Motions referred to Sarah A. L. Merriam (Oliver, T.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.