Childs v. Grogan
| Richard Thomas Childs |
| Brian Grogan |
| 3:2022cv00098 |
| January 19, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Victor A Bolden |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
REPLY to Response to #10 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Brian Grogan. (Ouellette, Scott)
|
|
Filing 11
Memorandum in Opposition by Plaintiff re #10 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Richard Thomas Childs. (Einhorn, Jonathan)
|
|
Filing 10
MOTION to Dismiss by Brian Grogan.Responses due by 3/22/2022 (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support)(Ouellette, Scott)
|
|
Filing 9
NOTICE of Appearance by Scott Roland Ouellette on behalf of Brian Grogan (Ouellette, Scott)
|
|
Filing 8
NOTICE of Appearance by James G. Williams on behalf of Brian Grogan (Williams, James)
|
|
Filing 7
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Richard Thomas Childs. Brian Grogan served on 2/8/2022, answer due 3/1/2022. (Einhorn, Jonathan)
|
|
Filing 6
ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *Brian Grogan* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Jonathan J. Einhorn* *Law Office of Jonathan J. Einhorn* *129 Whitney Avenue* *New Haven, CT 06510*. (Fazekas, J.)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #4 Standing Protective Order, #3 Electronic Filing Order, #2 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #1 Complaint filed by Richard Thomas Childs Signed by Clerk on 01/19/2022.(Fazekas, J.)
|
|
Filing 4
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 01/19/2022.(Fazekas, J.)
|
|
Filing 3
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 01/19/2022.(Fazekas, J.)
|
|
Filing 2
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 3/20/2022. Discovery due by 7/21/2022. Dispositive Motions due by 8/25/2022. Signed by Clerk on 01/19/2022.(Fazekas, J.)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Brian Grogan ( Filing fee $402 receipt number ACTDC-6796250.), filed by Richard Thomas Childs.(Einhorn, Jonathan)
|
|
Request for Clerk to issue summons as to Brian Grogan. (Einhorn, Jonathan)
|
|
Judge Victor A. Bolden added. (Oliver, T.)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Childs v. Grogan | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Richard Thomas Childs | |
| Represented By: | Jonathan J. Einhorn |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Brian Grogan | |
| Represented By: | James G. Williams |
| Represented By: | Scott Roland Ouellette |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
