Wilson v. Long Ridge Post Acute Care et al
| Travis Wilson |
| Long Ridge Post Acute Care and Marion Najamy |
| 3:2022cv00194 |
| February 2, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Victor A Bolden |
| S Dave Vatti |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge S. Dave Vatti for including #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 3/25/2022.Motions referred to S. Dave Vatti(Murphy, Tatihana)
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE re: Initial Discovery Protocols Signed by Clerk on 2/2/22. (Attachments: #1 Attachment)(Payton, R.)
|
|
Filing 5
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 2/2/22.(Payton, R.)
|
|
Filing 4
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 2/2/22.(Payton, R.)
|
|
Filing 3
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 4/3/2022 Discovery due by 8/4/2022 Dispositive Motions due by 9/8/2022 Signed by Clerk on 2/2/22.(Payton, R.)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Travis Wilson. (Payton, R.)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Long Ridge Post Acute Care, Marion Najamy, filed by Travis Wilson. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(Payton, R.)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
